{"id":11151,"date":"2001-06-06T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2001-06-06T00:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.deberes.net\/tesis\/sin-categoria\/the-rationality-of-belief-in-god-a-critical-exposition-ot-the-religiuous-epistemology-of-alvin-plantinga\/"},"modified":"2001-06-06T00:00:00","modified_gmt":"2001-06-06T00:00:00","slug":"the-rationality-of-belief-in-god-a-critical-exposition-ot-the-religiuous-epistemology-of-alvin-plantinga","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.deberes.net\/tesis\/filosofia\/the-rationality-of-belief-in-god-a-critical-exposition-ot-the-religiuous-epistemology-of-alvin-plantinga\/","title":{"rendered":"The rationality of belief in god. a critical exposition ot the religiuous epistemology of alvin plantinga"},"content":{"rendered":"<h2>Tesis doctoral de <strong> A. Maraya Erlito <\/strong><\/h2>\n<p>Alvin plantinga sostiene que la creencia en dios es racional, aunque no haya ning\u00fan argumento que la apoya. Plantinga dice que tal creencia es racional ya que es una creencia propiamente basica. Gracias a una facultad cognoscitiva, que el denomina \u00absensus divinitatis\u00bb, nosotros adquirimos la creencia de que dios existe, de modo inmediato y natural, con ocasi\u00f3n de ciertas experiencias, como por ejemplo, la lectura de la biblia y el sentimiento de culpabilidad.  ahora bien, sostenemos que platinga no ha sido capaz no s\u00f3lo de mostrar que existe la facultad \u00absensus divinitatis\u00bb sino tambi\u00e9n que la creencia en dios es propiamente b\u00e1sica. Por consiguiente, para defender la racionalidad de la creencia de que un dios personal, creador, todopoderoso y misericordioso existe, se necesitar\u00e1 alg\u00fan argumento para esto. En definitiva,esto supondr\u00eda la necesidad de la teolog\u00eda natural.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<h3>Datos acad\u00e9micos de la tesis doctoral \u00ab<strong>The rationality of belief in god. a critical exposition ot the religiuous epistemology of alvin plantinga<\/strong>\u00ab<\/h3>\n<ul>\n<li><strong>T\u00edtulo de la tesis:<\/strong>\u00a0 The rationality of belief in god. a critical exposition ot the religiuous epistemology of alvin plantinga <\/li>\n<li><strong>Autor:<\/strong>\u00a0 A. Maraya Erlito <\/li>\n<li><strong>Universidad:<\/strong>\u00a0 Navarra<\/li>\n<li><strong>Fecha de lectura de la tesis:<\/strong>\u00a0 06\/06\/2001<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<h3>Direcci\u00f3n y tribunal<\/h3>\n<ul>\n<li><strong>Director de la tesis<\/strong>\n<ul>\n<li>Enrique Roberto Moros Claramunt<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n<li><strong>Tribunal<\/strong>\n<ul>\n<li>Presidente del tribunal: Mar\u00eda no Artigas <\/li>\n<li>Francisco Conesa (vocal)<\/li>\n<li>Jaime Nubiola (vocal)<\/li>\n<li>Mar\u00eda Cerezo (vocal)<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Tesis doctoral de A. Maraya Erlito Alvin plantinga sostiene que la creencia en dios es racional, aunque no haya ning\u00fan [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"site-sidebar-layout":"default","site-content-layout":"","ast-site-content-layout":"","site-content-style":"default","site-sidebar-style":"default","ast-global-header-display":"","ast-banner-title-visibility":"","ast-main-header-display":"","ast-hfb-above-header-display":"","ast-hfb-below-header-display":"","ast-hfb-mobile-header-display":"","site-post-title":"","ast-breadcrumbs-content":"","ast-featured-img":"","footer-sml-layout":"","theme-transparent-header-meta":"","adv-header-id-meta":"","stick-header-meta":"","header-above-stick-meta":"","header-main-stick-meta":"","header-below-stick-meta":"","astra-migrate-meta-layouts":"default","ast-page-background-enabled":"default","ast-page-background-meta":{"desktop":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-4)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-gradient":""},"tablet":{"background-color":"","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-gradient":""},"mobile":{"background-color":"","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-gradient":""}},"ast-content-background-meta":{"desktop":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-5)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-gradient":""},"tablet":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-5)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-gradient":""},"mobile":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-5)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-gradient":""}},"footnotes":""},"categories":[5537,165,8535,956,17749,990,13455],"tags":[36649,36650,36651,36652,36653,17981],"class_list":["post-11151","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-epistemologia","category-filosofia","category-filosofia-actual","category-filosofia-del-conocimiento","category-navarra","category-sistemas-filosoficos","category-teoria-de-la-razon","tag-a-maraya-erlito","tag-enrique-roberto-moros-claramunt","tag-francisco-conesa","tag-jaime-nubiola","tag-maria-cerezo","tag-maria-no-artigas"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.deberes.net\/tesis\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11151","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.deberes.net\/tesis\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.deberes.net\/tesis\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.deberes.net\/tesis\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.deberes.net\/tesis\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=11151"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.deberes.net\/tesis\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11151\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.deberes.net\/tesis\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=11151"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.deberes.net\/tesis\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=11151"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.deberes.net\/tesis\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=11151"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}