{"id":114846,"date":"2018-03-11T10:43:02","date_gmt":"2018-03-11T10:43:02","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.deberes.net\/tesis\/sin-categoria\/el-delito-de-tortura-y-su-relacion-con-otros-atentados-contra-la-integridad-moral\/"},"modified":"2018-03-11T10:43:02","modified_gmt":"2018-03-11T10:43:02","slug":"el-delito-de-tortura-y-su-relacion-con-otros-atentados-contra-la-integridad-moral","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.deberes.net\/tesis\/derecho-penal\/el-delito-de-tortura-y-su-relacion-con-otros-atentados-contra-la-integridad-moral\/","title":{"rendered":"El delito de tortura y su relacion con otros atentados contra la integridad moral"},"content":{"rendered":"

Tesis doctoral de Mar\u00eda Jose Fernandez Torres <\/strong><\/h2>\n

1. Objetivos la elecci\u00f3n de la tortura como tema de investigaci\u00f3n tiene por objetivo probar que, en la lucha contra el terrorismo internacional, se ha devuelto a la actualidad esta instituci\u00f3n, abriendo de nuevo el debate jur\u00eddico y pol\u00edtico sobre su utilidad en el proceso penal del siglo xxi, ahora, desde postulados funcionalistas como los defendidos por jakobs en la teor\u00eda del "derecho penal del enemigo". 2. M\u00e9todo se ha utilizado un m\u00e9todo dogm\u00e1tico en el estudio del derecho positivo interno, derecho internacional p\u00fablico, jurisprudencia de la sala segunda del tribunal supremo, tribunal constitucional, doctrina elaborada por los \u00f3rganos de control del cumplimiento de los instrumentos internacionales que proh\u00edben la tortura, as\u00ed como los diversos trabajos elaborados por la doctrina penal al respecto. 3. Conclusiones abolida la tortura en las constituciones de bayona de 1808 y de c\u00e1diz de 1812, desde el c\u00f3digo penal de 1822, la nueva filosof\u00eda sobre la tortura se refleja en el proceso codificador de nuestro pa\u00eds, que a partir de esta fecha reprimir\u00e1 el maltrato al reo o detenido. la tipificaci\u00f3n en nuestro c\u00f3digo penal de 1995 de las conductas previstas en los arts. 174 y 175 supone la sanci\u00f3n del abuso de poder por parte de la administraci\u00f3n en el ejercicio de la funci\u00f3n p\u00fablica, manifestado en la lesi\u00f3n de la integridad moral. Se trata de delitos pluriofensivos que protegen la "integridad moral" y "el buen funcionamiento de la administraci\u00f3n". el art. 174 reprocha un delito de tendencia (delito de resultado cortado en el caso de la tortura indagatoria y delito de tendencia interna intensificada en los dem\u00e1s supuestos de tortura), especial propio y, en determinadas ocasiones, permanente. la justificaci\u00f3n de la tortura queda absolutamente rechazada. en relaci\u00f3n a las causas de exculpaci\u00f3n, s\u00f3lo proceder\u00eda la aplicaci\u00f3n de los supuestos de inimputabilidad como eximentes completas y de miedo insuperable, como supuesto de inexigibilidad de un comportamiento adecuado a la norma, como incompleta. del "iter criminis" cabe se\u00f1alar que el c\u00f3digo de 1995, a diferencia del anterior, no sanciona los actos preparatorios para cometer este injusto. de las circunstancias modificativas de la responsabilidad, analizamos extensamente las "dilaciones indebidas", criticando su apreciaci\u00f3n en este delito. Igual conclusi\u00f3n se alcanza en el estudio de la prescripci\u00f3n, el indulto y la amnist\u00eda. sobre la tortura como crimen internacional, se concluye que el crimen de lesa humanidad (art. 607 bis) sanciona conductas de extrema gravedad, entendidas como pluralidad de acciones (generalidad) en atenci\u00f3n a una pol\u00edtica preconcebida (sistem\u00e1tica) que causa sufrimientos f\u00edsicos o mentales en tiempos de guerra o de paz; no exige elementos teleol\u00f3gicos ni autor diferenciado y el bien jur\u00eddico protegido es la suma de la integridad f\u00edsica, mental y la dignidad de una pluralidad de individuos civiles, que interesa tutelar a la comunidad internacional. Mientras que el crimen de guerra (arts.608 y ss.) S\u00f3lo se produce durante un conflicto b\u00e9lico, no exige un agente diferenciado y los elementos subjetivos del injusto coinciden con los previstos en la convenci\u00f3n contra la tortura de 1984. para prevenir la impunidad de la tortura, la convenci\u00f3n contra la tortura de 1984 establece la cooperaci\u00f3n entre las partes en su art. 5. A este respecto, se analiza el principio de universalidad de la jurisdicci\u00f3n (art.23.4 lopj) que, tras la reforma introducida por la l.O. 1\/2009, de 3 de noviembre, restringe su \u00e1mbito de aplicaci\u00f3n, creando una instituci\u00f3n h\u00edbrida, compuesta por el principio de personalidad y real de la jurisdicci\u00f3n. el principio de no devoluci\u00f3n previsto en el art.3 de la convenci\u00f3n contra la tortura, se estudia como l\u00edmite a la extradici\u00f3n, analizando tanto la carga de la prueba como su extensi\u00f3n. 1.Objectives torture has been chosen as research topic in view to prove that, in the ware of the global fight against terrorism, this practice has come back to the legal and political debate. Its pertinence in the criminal process of the 21st century has been advocated from functionalist positions like those defended by jakobs in his theory of the 'criminal law of the enemy'. 2. Methodology this thesis follows a dogmatic approach analysing spanish law in force, international public law, case law of the spanish supreme court and constitutional court, doctrine of the bodies in charge of the enforcement of the international instruments that ban the torture, and work of the academia. 3. Conclusions torture was abolished in spain by the royal statute of bayonne of 1808 and by the constitution of cadiz of 1812. Since the criminal code of 1822, the new philosophy about torture has been reflected in the spanish process of legal codification, punishing ill-treatment to prisoners or to persons under arrest. the spanish criminal code of 1995 included the criminal conducts of abuse of power by public officials or other persons acting in an official capacity, committing an outrage upon moral integrity, in arts. 174 and 175. These are 'pluri-offensive' crimes that protect the 'moral integrity' and the 'good functioning of the public administration'. art.174 punishes a crime categorised as 'of tendency' ('crime of endangerment' in the case of torture inflicted to obtain information or a confession, and 'crime of internal intensified tendency' in the rest of the cases), 'specific', 'in proper sense', and in some cases, 'permanent'. the justification of the torture is absolutely rejected. in relation to the causes of absence of guilt, the absence of imputability would be applicable as complete exemption, and the 'unbearable fear', understood as a case of exemption of obligation of behaving according to the law, would be an incomplete exemption. concerning the 'iter criminis', the spanish criminal code of 1995 does not punish the preparatory acts to commit the offence, in contrast with the precedent code. about the circumstances that modify the liability, we will make an extensive analysis of the 'unjustified delays', criticising that they are considered in this crime. We get to similar conclusions related to the prescription, the pardon and the amnesty. when it comes to torture as international crime, we conclude that the crime against humanity (art. 607 bis) sanctions behaviours of extreme gravity, understood as a plurality of actions (generality) following a pre-conceived policy (systematic action) that inflicts physical or mental suffering in times of war or of peace. It does not require finalistic elements, neither a distinct author, and the protected factor is the addition of the physical and mental integrity and the dignity of a plurality of civil individuals that the international community is interested in preserving. On the other hand, the war crime (art. 608 and following ones) only can take place during an open conflict, it does not require a differentiated author, and the subjective elements are coincident with those of the convention against torture of 1984. to prevent the impunity of the torture, the convention against torture of 1984 establishes the cooperation between the parties in art. 5. Related to this, this thesis analyses the principle of universal jurisdiction (art. 23.4 of the spanish organic act of the judiciary power), whose scope of application was restricted since the entry into force of the organic act 1\/2009 of 3 november. Since then, spain has a hybrid institution that mixes the principles of real and personal jurisdiction. finally, the principle of 'non refoulement' foreseen in art. 3 of the convention against torture is also studied as a limit to the extradition, analysing the burden of the evidence and its scope.<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Datos acad\u00e9micos de la tesis doctoral \u00abEl delito de tortura y su relacion con otros atentados contra la integridad moral<\/strong>\u00ab<\/h3>\n
    \n
  • T\u00edtulo de la tesis:<\/strong>\u00a0 El delito de tortura y su relacion con otros atentados contra la integridad moral <\/li>\n
  • Autor:<\/strong>\u00a0 Mar\u00eda Jose Fernandez Torres <\/li>\n
  • Universidad:<\/strong>\u00a0 Murcia<\/li>\n
  • Fecha de lectura de la tesis:<\/strong>\u00a0 13\/11\/2013<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n

     <\/p>\n

    Direcci\u00f3n y tribunal<\/h3>\n
      \n
    • Director de la tesis<\/strong>\n
        \n
      • Mar\u00eda Dolores Fernandez Rodriguez<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n
      • Tribunal<\/strong>\n
          \n
        • Presidente del tribunal: gerardo Landrove diaz <\/li>\n
        • esperanza Vaello esquerdo (vocal)<\/li>\n
        • Jos\u00e9 Luis De la cuesta arzamendi (vocal)<\/li>\n
        • enrique Orts berenguer (vocal)<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n

           <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

          Tesis doctoral de Mar\u00eda Jose Fernandez Torres 1. Objetivos la elecci\u00f3n de la tortura como tema de investigaci\u00f3n tiene por […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"site-sidebar-layout":"default","site-content-layout":"","ast-site-content-layout":"","site-content-style":"default","site-sidebar-style":"default","ast-global-header-display":"","ast-banner-title-visibility":"","ast-main-header-display":"","ast-hfb-above-header-display":"","ast-hfb-below-header-display":"","ast-hfb-mobile-header-display":"","site-post-title":"","ast-breadcrumbs-content":"","ast-featured-img":"","footer-sml-layout":"","theme-transparent-header-meta":"","adv-header-id-meta":"","stick-header-meta":"","header-above-stick-meta":"","header-main-stick-meta":"","header-below-stick-meta":"","astra-migrate-meta-layouts":"default","ast-page-background-enabled":"default","ast-page-background-meta":{"desktop":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-4)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-gradient":""},"tablet":{"background-color":"","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-gradient":""},"mobile":{"background-color":"","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-gradient":""}},"ast-content-background-meta":{"desktop":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-5)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-gradient":""},"tablet":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-5)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-gradient":""},"mobile":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-5)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-gradient":""}},"footnotes":""},"categories":[613,8235],"tags":[9844,226360,57835,50382,148856,227480],"class_list":["post-114846","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-derecho-penal","category-murcia","tag-enrique-orts-berenguer","tag-esperanza-vaello-esquerdo","tag-gerardo-landrove-diaz","tag-jose-luis-de-la-cuesta-arzamendi","tag-maria-dolores-fernandez-rodriguez","tag-maria-jose-fernandez-torres"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.deberes.net\/tesis\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/114846","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.deberes.net\/tesis\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.deberes.net\/tesis\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.deberes.net\/tesis\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.deberes.net\/tesis\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=114846"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.deberes.net\/tesis\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/114846\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.deberes.net\/tesis\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=114846"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.deberes.net\/tesis\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=114846"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.deberes.net\/tesis\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=114846"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}