{"id":115081,"date":"2018-03-11T10:43:26","date_gmt":"2018-03-11T10:43:26","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.deberes.net\/tesis\/sin-categoria\/sistema-de-atrubucion-de-responsabilidad-penal-a-las-personas-jura%c2%addicas\/"},"modified":"2018-03-11T10:43:26","modified_gmt":"2018-03-11T10:43:26","slug":"sistema-de-atrubucion-de-responsabilidad-penal-a-las-personas-jura%c2%addicas","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.deberes.net\/tesis\/derecho-penal\/sistema-de-atrubucion-de-responsabilidad-penal-a-las-personas-jura%c2%addicas\/","title":{"rendered":"Sistema de atrubuci\u00f3n de responsabilidad penal a las personas jur\u00eddicas."},"content":{"rendered":"

Tesis doctoral de Jacinto Perez Arias <\/strong><\/h2>\n

Resumen: la presente tesis aborda el an\u00e1lisis del modelo de atribuci\u00f3n de responsabilidad penal de las personas jur\u00eddica en el ordenamiento jur\u00eddico espa\u00f1ol, establecido mediante lo 5\/2010 de reforma del c\u00f3digo penal. Adem\u00e1s de unas breves notas sobre la evoluci\u00f3n legislativa, hist\u00f3rica y de derecho comparado, se estudian los problemas mas relevantes de la responsabilidad penal corporativa, como la incapacidad de acci\u00f3n y culpabilidad de la persona jur\u00eddica, aspectos diferenciadores entre el derecho administrativo sancionador y el derecho penal, sistemas de prevenci\u00f3n a trav\u00e9s de compliance program, la cuestiones de orden procesal y la jurisprudencia m\u00e1s relevante en la materia. De manera independiente, se entra en el debate sobre si esta responsabilidad penal, como sostienen algunos autores, implica no solo el nacimiento de un nuevo sujeto para esta rama del derecho, sino si \u00e9ste sujeto, en la era postindustrial, ha desplazado a la persona f\u00edsica como verdadero protagonista de las relaciones sociales y jur\u00eddicas (teor\u00eda deshumanizante). Palabras clave: responsabilidad penal, persona jur\u00eddica, empresa, antijuridicidad, culpabilidad, compliance program, administrativo sancionador, acci\u00f3n comunicativa, proceso penal. metodolog\u00eda: estudio de bibliograf\u00eda jur\u00eddica, revistas especializadas y base jurisprudencial, nacional y extranjera. Asistencia y participaci\u00f3n en cursos y proyectos de investigaci\u00f3n sobre la responsabilidad penal de las personas jur\u00eddicas. conclusiones: 1.- La instauraci\u00f3n de la responsabilidad penal de la persona jur\u00eddica se debe solo a razones de pol\u00edtica criminal. No existe fundamento jur\u00eddico, ni filos\u00f3fico, que sustente la pretendida capacidad de la persona jur\u00eddica para ser sujeto activo en derecho penal. 2.- Los diversos modelos de responsabilidad de las personas jur\u00eddicas se han visto multiplicados en derecho comparado, si bien su incremento no lo es uniformemente en cuanto a su naturaleza penal. En la historia m\u00e1s reciente fue precisamente el derecho administrativo sancionador el que incluy\u00f3 (cre\u00e1ndola) la responsabilidad de la persona jur\u00eddica. 3.- La responsabilidad penal de las personas jur\u00eddicas desnaturaliza el derecho penal. La persona jur\u00eddica no tiene capacidad de acci\u00f3n ni capacidad de culpabilidad. Es solo un fin patrimonial. 4.-. Ninguna de las teor\u00edas construidas por la doctrina para justificar la responsabilidad penal de las personas jur\u00eddicas (esp\u00edritu normativo, funcional, car\u00e1cter de la empresa, defecto de organizaci\u00f3n, cultura empresarial constructivista, etc.) Se ajustan al principio de legalidad a la hora de conectar hecho y culpabilidad. 5- la ambig\u00ed\u00bcedad conceptual del art\u00edculo 31 bis va a permitir a la jurisprudencia perfilar y definir con absoluta libertad el modelo de responsabilidad penal de la persona jur\u00eddica, vulner\u00e1ndose principios como el de legalidad y taxatividad penal, seguridad jur\u00eddica, o el de prohibici\u00f3n de interpretaci\u00f3n extensiva de la norma penal. 6.- Art\u00edculo 31 bis. Establece un modelo de responsabilidad por transferencia, combinando un sistema de identificaci\u00f3n y un sistema vicarial. No cabe individualizar en ning\u00fan caso responsabilidad por hecho propio. Todo queda circunscrito a un hecho objetivo del que solo puede derivar una responsabilidad objetiva. Aceptar una idea de culpabilidad corporativa entra\u00f1a admitir una pura visi\u00f3n te\u00f3rica y extremadamente especulativa. 7.- Se acepta, como no puede ser de otro modo, que las personas jur\u00eddicas intervienen en el tr\u00e1fico jur\u00eddico-econ\u00f3mico, llegando a participar en acciones delictivas. Sin embargo, esta participaci\u00f3n, que es puramente instrumental, no puede ser objeto directo, sino indirecto, del derecho penal. 8.- Desde perspectivas procesales entiendo que el legislador ha improvisado el estatuto procesal de la persona jur\u00eddica. abstract: this dissertation approaches the analysis of legal persons' appointment of criminal responsibility model in the spanish legal system, established by the organic law lo 5\/2010 from the criminal code reform. As well as some brief review about the legislative, historic and comparative law evolution, the most important problems of corporate criminal responsibility are studied. Some of the latter are incapacity of action and legal person's guilt, some distinguishing aspects between disciplinary administrative law and criminal law, prevention systems through a compliance program, procedural matters and the case-law more relevant on the subject. In an independent way, it is brought up for discussion if criminal responsibility, as maintained by some authors, implies not only the birth of a new subject for this branch of law, but also if this subject, in the post-industrial age, has replaced the natural person as the real main character of social and legal relationships (dehumanized theory). Key words: criminal responsibility, legal person, company, anti-juridicity, guilt, compliance program, disciplinary administrative, communicative action, criminal proceeding. methodology: domestic and foreign study of legal bibliography, technical journals and jurisprudence basis; attendance and participation in courses and research projects on the criminal liability of legal persons. conclusions: 1. – Criminal responsibility establishment of legal person is only due to criminal policy reasons. There is no legal or philosophical fundamental which maintains the supposed legal person's ability to be an active subject in criminal law. 2. – Legal persons' responsibility different models have been increased in comparative law, although this growth is not uniform in terms of its criminal nature. In the most recent history it was precisely the disciplinary administrative law the one which contained (by creating it) the liability of the legal person. 3. – Criminal responsibility of legal person distorts the criminal law. The legal person has not the ability of action or guilt. It is only an assets purpose. 4. – None of the theories built by the doctrine in order to justify the criminal responsibility of legal persons (normative spirit, practical, company personality, organization defect, constructivist corporate culture, etc. . .) Is adjusted to the principle of legality when connecting fact and guilt. 5 – the conceptual ambiguity of article 31 bis allows the case-law to shape and define with absolute freedom the legal person's criminal liability model. That fact infringes principles such as legality and taxativity of criminal law, legal certainty or prohibition of an over interpretation of criminal rule. 6. – Article 31a sets a responsibility model by transfer, combining identification and a vicarious liability system. It is not possible to pick out liability from the fact itself. So that, everything is confined to an objective fact which can only cause an objective liability. Accepting the idea of corporate guilt involves also the acceptance of a simple theoretical and extremely speculative point of view. 7. – It has been accepted , as it could not be any other way, that legal persons take part in the legal -economic traffic, and they even get to participate in criminal activities . However, that involvement, which is purely instrumental, cannot be a direct but indirect object of criminal law. 8. – From procedural perspectives i understand that legislator improvises the legal person procedural statute.<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Datos acad\u00e9micos de la tesis doctoral \u00abSistema de atrubuci\u00f3n de responsabilidad penal a las personas jur\u00eddicas.<\/strong>\u00ab<\/h3>\n
    \n
  • T\u00edtulo de la tesis:<\/strong>\u00a0 Sistema de atrubuci\u00f3n de responsabilidad penal a las personas jur\u00eddicas. <\/li>\n
  • Autor:<\/strong>\u00a0 Jacinto Perez Arias <\/li>\n
  • Universidad:<\/strong>\u00a0 Murcia<\/li>\n
  • Fecha de lectura de la tesis:<\/strong>\u00a0 20\/12\/2013<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n

     <\/p>\n

    Direcci\u00f3n y tribunal<\/h3>\n
      \n
    • Director de la tesis<\/strong>\n
        \n
      • Jaime Miguel Peris Riera<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n
      • Tribunal<\/strong>\n
          \n
        • Presidente del tribunal: lorenzo Morillas cueva <\/li>\n
        • Jos\u00e9 Manuel Palma herrera (vocal)<\/li>\n
        • bernardo Del rosal blasco (vocal)<\/li>\n
        • Jos\u00e9 Luis Gonzalez cussac (vocal)<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n

           <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

          Tesis doctoral de Jacinto Perez Arias Resumen: la presente tesis aborda el an\u00e1lisis del modelo de atribuci\u00f3n de responsabilidad penal […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"site-sidebar-layout":"default","site-content-layout":"","ast-site-content-layout":"","site-content-style":"default","site-sidebar-style":"default","ast-global-header-display":"","ast-banner-title-visibility":"","ast-main-header-display":"","ast-hfb-above-header-display":"","ast-hfb-below-header-display":"","ast-hfb-mobile-header-display":"","site-post-title":"","ast-breadcrumbs-content":"","ast-featured-img":"","footer-sml-layout":"","theme-transparent-header-meta":"","adv-header-id-meta":"","stick-header-meta":"","header-above-stick-meta":"","header-main-stick-meta":"","header-below-stick-meta":"","astra-migrate-meta-layouts":"default","ast-page-background-enabled":"default","ast-page-background-meta":{"desktop":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-4)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-gradient":""},"tablet":{"background-color":"","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-gradient":""},"mobile":{"background-color":"","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-gradient":""}},"ast-content-background-meta":{"desktop":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-5)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-gradient":""},"tablet":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-5)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-gradient":""},"mobile":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-5)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-gradient":""}},"footnotes":""},"categories":[613,8235],"tags":[22736,227827,138768,134080,101295,21819],"class_list":["post-115081","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-derecho-penal","category-murcia","tag-bernardo-del-rosal-blasco","tag-jacinto-perez-arias","tag-jaime-miguel-peris-riera","tag-jose-luis-gonzalez-cussac","tag-jose-manuel-palma-herrera","tag-lorenzo-morillas-cueva"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.deberes.net\/tesis\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/115081","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.deberes.net\/tesis\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.deberes.net\/tesis\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.deberes.net\/tesis\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.deberes.net\/tesis\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=115081"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.deberes.net\/tesis\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/115081\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.deberes.net\/tesis\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=115081"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.deberes.net\/tesis\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=115081"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.deberes.net\/tesis\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=115081"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}