{"id":116629,"date":"2014-12-11T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2014-12-11T00:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.deberes.net\/tesis\/sin-categoria\/deixis-social-y-descortesa%c2%ada-verbal-como-estrategias-argumentativas-analisis-discursivo-del-debate-pola%c2%adtico-desde-un-enfoque-sociopragmatico\/"},"modified":"2014-12-11T00:00:00","modified_gmt":"2014-12-11T00:00:00","slug":"deixis-social-y-descortesa%c2%ada-verbal-como-estrategias-argumentativas-analisis-discursivo-del-debate-pola%c2%adtico-desde-un-enfoque-sociopragmatico","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.deberes.net\/tesis\/linguistica\/deixis-social-y-descortesa%c2%ada-verbal-como-estrategias-argumentativas-analisis-discursivo-del-debate-pola%c2%adtico-desde-un-enfoque-sociopragmatico\/","title":{"rendered":"Deixis social y (des)cortes\u00edaverbal como estrategias argumentativas. an\u00e1lisis discursivo del debate pol\u00edtico desde un enfoque sociopragm\u00e1tico"},"content":{"rendered":"<h2>Tesis doctoral de <strong> Encarnacion Perez Garcia <\/strong><\/h2>\n<p>Resumen  esta investigaci\u00f3n parte de considerar la lengua como principal v\u00eda de contacto para la transmisi\u00f3n de ideas, pensamientos e intenciones tanto individuales como colectivas. A esto se une la afirmaci\u00f3n de que la lengua no es un mecanismo est\u00e1tico, sino que refleja los cambios y los acontecimientos que suceden en la sociedad. Se establece, por tanto, el binomio lengua\/sociedad a partir del concepto de interacci\u00f3n verbal. En este trabajo, se demostrar\u00e1 c\u00f3mo determinados usos ling\u00ed\u00bc\u00edsticos se ponen al servicio del hablante para la consecuci\u00f3n de fines concretos, elaborados seg\u00fan las exigencias del contexto inmediato en que se establece el intercambio comunicativo, as\u00ed como de los sucesos sociales que inciden en la construcci\u00f3n de estrategias. De esta forma, se justifica el enfoque sociopragm\u00e1tico, seleccionado para abordar la aplicaci\u00f3n pr\u00e1ctica de los estudios te\u00f3ricos iniciales. Tras la explicaci\u00f3n de las distintas aportaciones ling\u00ed\u00bc\u00edsticas, se llegar\u00e1 a la categorizaci\u00f3n de los mecanismos en los que se basa esta investigaci\u00f3n: deixis social y (des)cortes\u00eda verbal, como procedimientos que apoyan la finalidad persuasiva del emisor, propia del discurso argumentativo.  el m\u00e9todo escogido para cumplir los objetivos propuestos tiene un principio deductivo, pues se inicia con la revisi\u00f3n te\u00f3rica hasta llegar a al an\u00e1lisis discursivo de un corpus, formado por un debate pol\u00edtico parlamentario en el que se dirime un asunto de importancia social (enmarcado en la crisis econ\u00f3mica de 2008). Para llevar a cabo este trabajo se han planteado los siguientes objetivos: 1) elaborar un marco te\u00f3rico en el que se explique la lengua por su car\u00e1cter social; 2) definir la interacci\u00f3n verbal como unidad de an\u00e1lisis; 3) profundizar en aspectos de socioling\u00ed\u00bc\u00edstica, pragm\u00e1tica y an\u00e1lisis del discurso; 4) observar la codificaci\u00f3n en la lengua de la relaciones interpersonales a trav\u00e9s de la deixis social y la (des)cortes\u00eda verbal, hasta llegar al enfoque sociopragm\u00e1tico; 5) estudiar los trabajos m\u00e1s significativos en torno al an\u00e1lisis del discurso y a la tipolog\u00eda para la descripci\u00f3n del texto argumentativo, en concreto el debate pol\u00edtico; 6) seleccionar y analizar un corpus con datos concretos para demostrar la teor\u00eda inicial; 7) observar c\u00f3mo la deixis social y la (des)cortes\u00eda verbal se comportan como estrategias de apoyo a la argumentaci\u00f3n en el debate pol\u00edtico, a la vez que informan sobre la intenci\u00f3n persuasiva de los participantes; 8) determinar de qu\u00e9 forma el receptor se encuentra en el discurso del emisor para influir sobre \u00e9l; 9) sistematizar los resultados obtenidos de esta investigaci\u00f3n en la elaboraci\u00f3n de las conclusiones.  finalmente, tras el trabajo de investigaci\u00f3n y an\u00e1lisis se han llegado a las siguientes conclusiones: 1) las primeras  investigaciones ling\u00ed\u00bc\u00edsticas dejaron de lado el aspecto social y comunicativo; 2) la inclusi\u00f3n del concepto contexto abri\u00f3 paso a nuevas disciplinas, entre ellas la pragm\u00e1tica y el an\u00e1lisis del discurso, que parten del estudio de la interacci\u00f3n verbal; 3) se ha comprobado que la deixis social y la (des)cortes\u00eda verbal funcionan como estrategias que ayudan a la persuasi\u00f3n en el texto argumentativo, especialmente en el debate pol\u00edtico; 4) la lengua refleja los cambios sociales con usos ling\u00ed\u00bc\u00edsticos-estrat\u00e9gicos seg\u00fan la intenci\u00f3n del hablante, como ocurre con el concepto acu\u00f1ado en este trabajo de cortes\u00eda solidaria, entendiendo por tal que mediante la muestra de comprensi\u00f3n hacia sectores desfavorecidos, el emisor pretende ganarse la confianza del conjunto de la sociedad.  la presente investigaci\u00f3n contribuye a \u00e1reas espec\u00edficas de conocimiento como la pol\u00edtica, la oratoria, la ret\u00f3rica, la pragm\u00e1tica, la socioling\u00ed\u00bc\u00edstica y el an\u00e1lisis del discurso, as\u00ed como a la formaci\u00f3n del profesorado de cualquier \u00e1mbito, especialmente el ling\u00ed\u00bc\u00edstico y filos\u00f3fico. Supone, adem\u00e1s, el inicio de futuros trabajos que profundicen en la perspectiva sociopragm\u00e1tica.               abstract  the present research derives from regarding language as the principal means for the transmission of ideas, thoughts and intentions, both individual and collective. This is added to the assertion which states that language is not a static mechanism, but rather reflects the changes and events occurring in society. Therefore, the binomial language\/society is established, stemming from the concept of verbal interaction. Throughout the present work, it will be proven how certain linguistic uses are put at the speaker\u00c2\u00bfs service for the accomplishment of specific purposes, drawn up according to the demands of the immediate context where the communicative exchange is produced, as well as the social circumstances which affect the development of strategies. This way, the socio-pragmatic approach, chosen so as to perform the practical application of the initial theoretical studies, is justified. The explanation of the different linguistic contributions will next lead to the categorization of mechanisms on which the present research is based: social deixis and verbal (im)politeness, as procedures which support the persuasive function of the speaker, characteristic of the argumentative speech.  the methodology chosen to fulfill the proposed objectives has a deductive principle, for it starts off with the theoretical revision, leading up to the discursive analysis of a corpus, formed  by a parliamentarian political debate (centered on the economic crisis of 2008). To carry out this work, the following objectives were set: 1) devising a theoretical framework when language is explained on the grounds of its social character; 2) defining verbal interaction as the unit of analysis; 3) delving into aspects of sociolinguistics, pragmatics and discourse analysis; 4) observing the codification of interpersonal relationships existing in language by means of social deixis and verbal (im)politeness, leading up to the socio-pragmatic approach; 5) analyzing the most significant works dealing with discourse analysis and the typology for the description of the argumentative text, more specifically, the political debate; 6) choosing and analyzing a corpus of concrete data to prove the initial theory; 7) observing how social deixis and verbal (im)politeness act as support strategies for the argumentation within the political debate, while informing about the persuasive intention of the participants; 8) determining how the receiver deals with the speaker\u00c2\u00bfs discourse so as to exert an influence over it; 9) systematizing the results obtained from this research in the elaboration of conclusions.  finally, after the research and analysis process, the following conclusions were drawn: 1) the original linguistic research neglected the social and communicative aspects; 2) the inclusion of the concept context gave way for new disciplines, pragmatics and discourse analysis among them, which stem from the study of verbal interaction; 3) it has been proven that social deixis and verbal (im)politeness work as strategies which contribute to persuasion in the argumentative text, especially in the context of the political debate; 4) language reflects the social changes with strategic linguistic uses depending on the speaker\u00c2\u00bfs intention, as happens with the concept of solidary politeness, coined for this work, understood as how by means of the expression of sympathy for disadvantaged social groups, the speaker intends to gain the confidence of society as a whole.  the present research contributes to specific areas of knowledge such as politics, oratory, pragmatics, sociolinguistics, discourse analysis, as well as teacher training in any given field, especially the linguistic and philosophical. It supposes, as well, the beginning of future works which may delve further into the socio-pragmatic perspective.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<h3>Datos acad\u00e9micos de la tesis doctoral \u00ab<strong>Deixis social y (des)cortes\u00edaverbal como estrategias argumentativas. an\u00e1lisis discursivo del debate pol\u00edtico desde un enfoque sociopragm\u00e1tico<\/strong>\u00ab<\/h3>\n<ul>\n<li><strong>T\u00edtulo de la tesis:<\/strong>\u00a0 Deixis social y (des)cortes\u00edaverbal como estrategias argumentativas. an\u00e1lisis discursivo del debate pol\u00edtico desde un enfoque sociopragm\u00e1tico <\/li>\n<li><strong>Autor:<\/strong>\u00a0 Encarnacion Perez Garcia <\/li>\n<li><strong>Universidad:<\/strong>\u00a0 Murcia<\/li>\n<li><strong>Fecha de lectura de la tesis:<\/strong>\u00a0 12\/11\/2014<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<h3>Direcci\u00f3n y tribunal<\/h3>\n<ul>\n<li><strong>Director de la tesis<\/strong>\n<ul>\n<li>Susana Ridao Rodrigo<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n<li><strong>Tribunal<\/strong>\n<ul>\n<li>Presidente del tribunal: carmen Gal\u00e1n rodr\u00edguez <\/li>\n<li>Mar\u00eda  isabel Lopez Martinez (vocal)<\/li>\n<li>Miguel \u00e1ngel Esparza torres (vocal)<\/li>\n<li>Manuel Pru\u00f1onosa tom\u00e1s (vocal)<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Tesis doctoral de Encarnacion Perez Garcia Resumen esta investigaci\u00f3n parte de considerar la lengua como principal v\u00eda de contacto para [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"site-sidebar-layout":"default","site-content-layout":"","ast-site-content-layout":"","site-content-style":"default","site-sidebar-style":"default","ast-global-header-display":"","ast-banner-title-visibility":"","ast-main-header-display":"","ast-hfb-above-header-display":"","ast-hfb-below-header-display":"","ast-hfb-mobile-header-display":"","site-post-title":"","ast-breadcrumbs-content":"","ast-featured-img":"","footer-sml-layout":"","theme-transparent-header-meta":"","adv-header-id-meta":"","stick-header-meta":"","header-above-stick-meta":"","header-main-stick-meta":"","header-below-stick-meta":"","astra-migrate-meta-layouts":"default","ast-page-background-enabled":"default","ast-page-background-meta":{"desktop":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-4)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-gradient":""},"tablet":{"background-color":"","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-gradient":""},"mobile":{"background-color":"","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-gradient":""}},"ast-content-background-meta":{"desktop":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-5)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-gradient":""},"tablet":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-5)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-gradient":""},"mobile":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-5)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-gradient":""}},"footnotes":""},"categories":[8763,59,24083,8235],"tags":[66854,230160,58586,128706,36184,141168],"class_list":["post-116629","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-lengua-y-cultura","category-linguistica","category-linguistica-sociologica","category-murcia","tag-carmen-galan-rodriguez","tag-encarnacion-perez-garcia","tag-manuel-prunonosa-tomas","tag-maria-isabel-lopez-Martinez","tag-miguel-angel-esparza-torres","tag-susana-ridao-rodrigo"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.deberes.net\/tesis\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/116629","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.deberes.net\/tesis\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.deberes.net\/tesis\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.deberes.net\/tesis\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.deberes.net\/tesis\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=116629"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.deberes.net\/tesis\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/116629\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.deberes.net\/tesis\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=116629"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.deberes.net\/tesis\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=116629"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.deberes.net\/tesis\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=116629"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}